Built in A verified double-blind review, with the conflicts checked for you

Your congress runs on four systems that don't speak to each other.

Registration, payment, submissions and a verified double-blind review, in one place — with a single record for the person who is author, reviewer and committee member all at once.

Create your event Walk through a live event
  • No contract
  • You keep the merchant account
  • 8% all-in, card processing included
The organizer's Overview for ICMB 2026: nine days until early registration closes, an amber alert that three papers in Structural biology have no eligible reviewer left, and cards for 412 registered, 227 submitted, 110 of 203 reviews returned and the money credited.
8%

The whole invoice. Card processing is inside it.

1

Record per person, whatever roles they hold.

0

Conflicted pairings offered to a reviewer.

1 afternoon

To clone last year into the next edition.

How a paper moves

From the author's upload to the committee's decision

Nothing below asks you to move a file between two systems. That is the entire product.

  1. 1
    Author

    Registers, pays and submits

    In the same sitting, declaring every co-author on submission.

  2. 2
    Engine

    Crosses the declarations

    A conflicted pairing is never offered — and neither side learns who the other is.

  3. 3
    Reviewer

    Reads blinded, scores the rubric

    Only their assigned papers, with the authors' names searched out of the text before it reaches them.

  4. 4
    Committee

    Decides, on the record

    Every step is a plain sentence in the trail, and the decisions reach authors when you send them.

Built for committees with no administrator

Everything a scientific committee does, in one system

The platform checks conflicts, so the jury never has to

Reviewers declare their conflicts once. Authors declare every co-author on submission. The assignment engine intersects the two and simply never offers a conflicted pairing — without either side learning who the other is.

0141 → H. SørensenOffered · no conflict
0141 → C. AlmeidaNever offered · same institute
0141 → P. RamanNever offered · co-author

One person. One record. Every role.

Dr. Ferreira submits to session B, reviews for session C and sits on the organizing committee. She is one row in your database, not three in three systems.

Author · BJury · CCommittee

The fifteenth edition takes an afternoon

Clone last year: sessions, fee tiers and periods, rubrics, certificate templates, and the reviewer pool you spent three months assembling.

ICMB 2025ICMB 2026 · cloned

When nobody is left, it says so — and why

A small jury and honest declarations will do this. Borrow from another session or invite a new reviewer; both keep the exclusions intact.

0128 · Three reviewers declared thesis supervision.

Pricing

Eight percent. That is the whole invoice.

Card processing is inside the eight, not on top of it. A registrant paying from Tokyo with a converted currency costs you exactly what one paying from Lisbon costs you.

  • Free registrations — your jury, your invited speakers, your own committee — cost nothing at all.
  • No contract. You keep the merchant account.
  • The example beside this is computed by the same code that settles a real charge.
8%

A registration paid with a domestic card

Registration 100.00
Card processing−1.75
Our management fee−6.25
You are credited92.00

Set it up once, in an evening. Clone it every year after that.

Nothing to install, no contract, and your existing payment account.

Create your event Walk through a live event